“It’s hysteria right now”
I-Fans,
The quote is from a State Farm lobbyist, and the hysteria is not in Baton Rouge or Jackson, but Tallahassee.
Here’s the headline:
Suddenly, a pro-consumer Legislature emerges
and here’s the story from Sunday’s Sarasota-based Herald-Tribune.
What matters about the proposals below is that they’re backed by the new Republican governor, Charlie Crist, the former attorney general who became known as “Chain Gang Charlie” because he supported their use for prison inmates. Although Crist has pro-consumer initiatives on his record as well, this isn’t exactly Rosa Luxemburg.
Also noteworthy is what the Herald Tribune State House reporter, Lloyd Dunkelberger, says in his lede (first paragraph):
“TALLAHASSEE — In this week’s special session, Florida lawmakers are poised to pass some of the strongest, pro-consumer insurance legislation that perhaps has ever been seen in Tallahassee. “
And then in this interesting observation:
“If the legislation becomes law — which seems likely at this point – it will be harder for property insurance companies to raise their rates despite the state’s recent history of hurricanes. The overnight transformation of a Republican, anti-regulation Legislature into a Ralph Nader-esque entity has left insurance lobbyists stunned.
‘It’s hysteria right now,’ one complained.”
The measures, which seem likely to pass, include:
1. Rolling back a 56 percent rate hike by Florida’s state-run Citizens Property Insurance
2. Prohibiting cancellations during hurricane season;
3. Banning “excess profits” by insurers;
4. Ending “cherry-picking,” refusing to sell property coverage while selling auto and other more profitable lines;
5. Banning the longstanding use of Florida-only subsidiaries, known as “pup companies, which critics say obscure a national insurer’s true financial health.
6. Eliminating arbitration panels considered industry friendly.
7. Requiring insurance executives to sign legal oaths validating the truthfulness of their state financial filings.
8. Requiring annual “insurer report cards,” which would give companies a letter grade based on issues such as the number of consumer complaints filed against the company. (Report cards. Hmm. Why didn’t ITP think of that?)
There’s more, but you get the point. If those seem to be market-unfriendly measures, they probably are. I sometimes say Katrina created an important insurance laboratory, but really Florida’s insurance dilemma is much bigger, more advanced and more acute.
Thanks to Non-Profit Prophet
More news from Florida:
Insurance weighs heavily on state
The sub-headline is: “Nature’s fury, market forces drive Florida to the brink.”
And in Mississippi, the Sun-Herald’s Anita Lee reports that Attorney General Jim Hood’s grand jury investigation is continuing:
State Farm employee to testify
Thanks to MizBizJourno
January 17th, 2007 at 12:43 pm
Person Familiar says
“If these measures become law, insurers will vote with their feet, taking with them their talent and expertise in handling claims after a disaster. In their place will be the government’s authority to sell debt - minus the efficiency to quickly and efficiently allocate capital to disaster victims. Ultimately, the market will become chaotic, and before the politicians understand what they did to create that chaos, property owners - including business property owners who employ people - will have declared Florida an unbearably hostile environment to live, work and invest. Florida should study what happened to the homeowners market in Texas when mold spawned political solutions that in turn spawned chaos whose only real victims were the homeowners.”
January 17th, 2007 at 12:44 pm
I reply:
Good point. I doubt you can monkey around with the market like that, especially in such a piece-meal way. I wonder, though, what the best approach would be if we started from scratch, no McCarran-Ferguson. It’d be a shame if, out of this crisis, we just get policy that makes things even less efficient.
January 17th, 2007 at 4:24 pm
Now, hypothetically, if the insurance-industry workers were to go on strike, in just Florida, until their demands for money and/or work environment were met, would the general reaction to the interruption in service be treated the same way?
February 7th, 2007 at 8:58 am
[…] Insurer pals, the WSJ does you no favors here, trust me. What you want is more understanding of the fine points, not less. If you get into name-calling and misrepresenting both the facts on the Gulf and the legal arguments, no one is helped. What you get is Florida. […]